Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether receipts from grant of non-exclusive, non-transferable software licences and associated restrictions constituted royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 and Article 12(3) of the India-USA Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement, and whether the domestic-law amendments enlarging royalty could be imported into the treaty.
Analysis: The licence terms showed that the customer received only a limited right to use the software for internal business purposes during the subscription period, with no right to exploit, transfer, sub-license, modify, decompile, reverse engineer, or commercially deal with the software. The rights conferred were held to be merely incidental to use of a copyrighted product and not a transfer of any copyright right within the meaning of the Copyright Act, 1957. Following the jurisdictional High Court decisions, the Tribunal held that a payment for a copyrighted article is distinct from payment for use of copyright, and that the retrospective enlargement of royalty in domestic law cannot be read into the treaty.
Conclusion: The receipts were not royalty under Article 12(3) of the treaty and could not be taxed as royalty under section 9(1)(vi) of the Income-tax Act, 1961; the issue was decided in favour of the assessee.