Compensatory interest and project-linked receipts may be adjusted, while VAT penalties remain non-deductible under income tax law.

VAT-related levies are deductible only to the extent they are compensatory in character; penalties for statutory defaults remain non-deductible under Explanation 1 to section 37, while compensatory interest for delayed tax payment may be allowed. On that basis, only the interest charged under section 30(1) of the Jharkhand VAT Act was treated as allowable, and the penalty components and other non-compensatory levies were disallowed. Interest earned on temporary deposits from funds inextricably linked to expansion was held to have a direct nexus with the project and was therefore netted off against pre-operative expenditure rather than assessed separately as income from other sources.

---

---

Issues: (i) Whether the amounts paid towards VAT-related penal charges and interest were allowable as deduction, in whole or in part, under the Income-tax Act, 1961; (ii) Whether interest earned on temporary deposits made out of funds linked with expansion could be netted off against pre-operative expenditure.

Issue (i): Whether the amounts paid towards VAT-related penal charges and interest were allowable as deduction, in whole or in part, under the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Analysis: The liability for statutory dues may crystallise in the year of demand, and tax paid on that basis may be admissible under Section 43B of the Income-tax Act, 1961. However, amounts paid by way of penalty for defaults such as delayed filing of returns, delayed audit report, or delayed payment of tax under the Jharkhand VAT Act, 2005 were examined with reference to the nature of each levy. Amounts imposed under Section 30(4)(d) and Section 63(3) were treated as penalties for defaults and not compensatory in nature. Amounts levied under Section 30(3), though computed with reference to tax and interest, were also held to be in addition to the tax and interest payable and therefore not compensatory. In contrast, interest charged under Section 30(1) was held to be compensatory for delay in payment of tax and thus allowable under Explanation 1 to Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

Conclusion: The deduction was allowed only for the compensatory interest under Section 30(1) of the Jharkhand VAT Act, 2005, and disallowed for the penalty components and non-compensatory levies.

Issue (ii): Whether interest earned on temporary deposits made out of funds linked with expansion could be netted off against pre-operative expenditure.

Analysis: Interest earned on funds that were inextricably linked with the setting up of the new unit was treated as having a direct nexus with the project. Following the principle of netting off, such interest was directed to be adjusted against incidental expenses during construction rather than assessed separately as income from other sources. The treatment was consistent with the principle that receipts integrally connected with the project reduce the project cost.

Conclusion: The netting off of the interest income against pre-operative expenditure was upheld in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded in part on the VAT-related deduction issue and fully succeeded on the interest netting issue, while the Revenue's challenge to the capitalisation-related adjustment failed.

Ratio Decidendi: A levy is deductible only if it is compensatory in character, whereas penalties for statutory defaults are hit by Explanation 1 to Section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961; and interest receipts directly linked to project setup may be set off against pre-operative expenditure under the netting principle.

---