Tribunal confirms disallowance under section 69C, upholds assessment reopening, orders fresh assessment, and allows cross-appeals.

The Tribunal upheld the estimation of net profit at 6% on unproved purchases for AY 2009-10 and 2011-12, dismissing the assessee's challenge and confirming the disallowance under section 69C. The Tribunal also validated the reopening of assessment under section 147/148 based on information from the Sales Tax Department, rejecting the assessee's objection. Additionally, the Tribunal directed a fresh assessment for AY 2009-10 and 2011-12, emphasizing the need for cross-examination and submission of relevant documents. Cross-appeals by both the assessee and the Revenue were allowed for statistical purposes.

---

---

Issues:
1. Estimation of net profit on alleged unproved purchases by the assessee.
2. Validity of reopening assessment u/s 147/148.
3. Disallowance made u/s 69C in AY 2009-10 and 2011-12.
4. Cross-appeals by the assessee and the Revenue.

Estimation of Net Profit on Alleged Unproved Purchases:
The assessee raised a ground against the Ld. CIT(A) for estimating net profit at 6% on unproved purchases, disregarding the submission and evidence. The Ld. CIT(A) estimated profits based on the alleged bogus purchases, citing the decision in Shri Jitendra Motani case and the Hon'ble Gujarat High Court judgment. The Ld. CIT(A) calculated profits at 6% for AY 2009-10 and AY 2011-12, leading to specific profit figures. The Tribunal noted the absence of the assessee during the hearing, and the Ld. DR argued for confirming the disallowance under section 69C based on the N.K. Proteins Ltd. judgment. The Tribunal analyzed the facts and upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s estimation of profits, dismissing the arguments against the reopening of assessment.

Validity of Reopening Assessment u/s 147/148:
The AO reopened the assessment under section 147/148 based on information from the Sales Tax Department, Government of Maharashtra. The assessee challenged the reopening, citing the ACIT vs. Rajesh Jhaveri Stock Brokers P. Ltd. case. The Tribunal dismissed the objection, stating that the notice u/s 148 was valid as per the Supreme Court's decision. The Tribunal upheld the AO's right to issue the notice post-receipt of information, leading to the dismissal of the assessee's objection against the reopening for AY 2009-10 and 2011-12.

Disallowance Made u/s 69C in AY 2009-10 and 2011-12:
The AO made additions under section 69C due to alleged bogus purchases by the assessee. The Ld. CIT(A) upheld the additions based on the percentage of bogus purchases in total purchases for both AY 2009-10 and 2011-12. The Tribunal referenced the N.K Proteins Ltd. case where the High Court directed the addition of entire bogus purchases. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of examining the concerned parties and allowing cross-examination to ensure a fair hearing. Consequently, the Tribunal set aside the Ld. CIT(A)'s order, directing a fresh assessment with an opportunity for cross-examination and submission of relevant documents before finalizing the assessment order.

Cross-Appeals by the Assessee and the Revenue:
The Tribunal allowed the cross-appeals filed by both the assessee and the Revenue for statistical purposes. The decision was pronounced in the open Court on 11/10/2017, concluding the proceedings related to the consolidated appeals against the order of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Nasik.

This detailed analysis covers the estimation of net profit on unproved purchases, the validity of reopening assessment, disallowance under section 69C, and the outcome of the cross-appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue before the Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai in the cited judgment.

---