Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the respondent was entitled to opening of the sealed cover and promotion on revocation of suspension, notwithstanding the subsequent issuance of charge-sheet and pendency of disciplinary proceedings.
Analysis: The respondent's case was correctly placed in a sealed cover when the DPC met because he was under suspension, attracting para 2 of the Office Memorandum dated 14 September 1992. Para 7 of the same Office Memorandum provides that where any circumstance mentioned in para 2 arises before actual promotion, the government servant is to be treated as if the case had been kept in sealed cover and is not to be promoted until completely exonerated. The revocation of suspension did not amount to a clean chit, and the subsequent issuance of charge-sheet brought the case squarely within the embargo under the Office Memorandum. The decision relied upon by the Tribunal concerned materially different facts, where no such circumstance existed on the relevant date.
Conclusion: The respondent was not entitled to opening of the sealed cover or promotion until complete exoneration, and the Tribunal's direction to the contrary was unsustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a government servant's case is rightly kept in a sealed cover at the DPC stage because he is under suspension, the employer may lawfully withhold opening of the cover and deny promotion if a charge-sheet is issued before actual promotion and disciplinary proceedings are pending, unless the employee is completely exonerated.