TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition after condoning the delay.</h1> <h3>PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/s IDMC LIMITED</h3> The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition after condoning the delay. - PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Versus M/s IDMC LIMITED - TMI Additional depreciation claim @ 20% under Section 32 [1](iia) - machinery purchased before 31st March 2005, but installed after 31st March 2005 ? - Held that:- SLP dismissed. HC order confirmed [2017 (2) TMI 644 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT] saying that the provision of section 32(1)(iia) of the IT Act is required to be interpreted reasonably and purposively as the strict and literal reading of section 32(1)(iia) of the IT Act will lead to an absurd result denying the additional depreciation to the assessee though admittedly the assessee has installed new plant and machinery. Under the circumstances, no error has been committed by the learned ITAT in allowing the additional depreciation at the rate of 20% on the plant and machinery installed by the assessee after 31st Day of March 2005 i.e. the year under consideration. No substantial question of law arise. - Decided in favour of the assessee The Supreme Court dismissed the Special Leave Petition after condoning the delay.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
