Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the imported crude palm oil was entitled to the benefit of Notification No. 21/2002-Customs despite the test report showing carotenoid content below the prescribed level, having regard to the delay in testing and the evidence that beta carotene content diminishes with time and improper storage.
Analysis: The test of the samples was conducted more than 10 days after drawing, and there was no evidence that the samples were stored in ideal conditions to preserve their original composition. Scientific material and earlier Tribunal decisions showed that the beta carotene content in crude palm oil can reduce with lapse of time and temperature variation if not kept under controlled storage. The contemporaneous supplier certificates stated that the carotenoid content at shipment was above the prescribed level, and the later test results could not be treated as conclusive of the condition at the time of import in the absence of proper preservation of samples.
Conclusion: The denial of the notification benefit was unsustainable, and the classification and differential duty demands based solely on the belated test results could not be upheld. The appeals were allowed in favour of the assessee.