Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether reassessment proceedings under sections 147 and 148 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 were valid, and whether the addition based on alleged business connection or income accrual from the liaison office could be sustained.
Analysis: The notice for reassessment was issued after a survey, but the objections raised to reopening were not disposed of before the assessment was completed. The liaison office was found to be operating within the confines of the RBI permission, which permitted only liaison work for recruiting Indian crew and prohibited any income-earning consultancy or commercial activity. The assessment order did not identify any income actually earned by the assessee in India; instead, it adopted the receipts of another company as a basis for estimation. On these facts, no taxable income accruing or arising in India was shown, and the reopening was held to be unsustainable.
Conclusion: The reassessment under sections 147 and 148 was invalid and the issue was decided in favour of the assessee against the Revenue.
Ratio Decidendi: Where objections to reopening are not disposed of and the record does not establish any taxable income accruing or arising in India from the assessee's permitted liaison activities, reassessment under sections 147 and 148 cannot be sustained.