Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the declared transaction value of the imported goods could be rejected and the assessable value enhanced on the basis of market enquiry and NIDB data, and whether the impugned order sustaining such enhancement was liable to be set aside.
Analysis: The declared invoice value was not shown to be unsupported by evidence or otherwise non-genuine. The department did not follow the valuation sequence prescribed for redetermination of value and instead relied on market enquiry prices. Such enhancement was not founded on sufficient reasons for rejection of transaction value or on proper contemporaneous import evidence. The statement relied upon had also been retracted, and reliance on that statement together with NIDB data was held to be an improper basis for fixing assessable value.
Conclusion: The enhancement of assessable value could not be sustained and the order affirming it was set aside in full.
Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded and the assessee obtained complete relief against the valuation enhancement and consequential demand and penalty.
Ratio Decidendi: Declared transaction value cannot be rejected and enhanced merely on market enquiry or NIDB data unless the department first establishes valid grounds for rejection and redetermines value in accordance with the prescribed valuation sequence.