Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether pan masala containing tobacco and gutka were covered by the sales tax exemption for tobacco under the Delhi Sales Tax Act, 1975, and how the conflicting lines of authority on the interaction between a tax-free entry and a later rate-entry amendment were to be resolved.
Analysis: The judgment examined the Delhi statutory scheme of incidence of tax, rate of tax, and tax-free goods, together with the scheduled entry defining tobacco by reference to the Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944. It also noted the conflict between earlier decisions treating an exemption entry as continuing notwithstanding a later rate-entry amendment, and another line of cases holding that a later rate notification could withdraw the exemption by implication. On that basis, the Court found that the conflict in precedent required authoritative resolution by a larger Bench.
Outcome: The matter was placed before the Hon'ble Chief Justice of India for constituting an appropriate Bench to decide the correctness of the conflicting lines of authority.