Appeals allowed and matter remitted for de novo Assessing Officer review of whether corporation qualifies as educational institution under s.10(22)

SC allowed the appeals and remitted the matter to the Assessing Officer for fresh consideration whether the corporation qualifies as an "educational institution" under s.10(22). The Court directed the AO to assess historical background, source of funding, shareholding, return on investment and to account for CBDT and Central Government letters and relevant HC precedents (including Rajasthan and Orissa decisions) rather than simply remanding to the High Court. The SC thus ordered de novo consideration in light of those materials.

---

---

Issues:
1. Whether the Corporation qualifies as an 'Educational Institution' under Section 10(22) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the relevant Assessment Years.

Analysis:

The case involved the appeal of a Corporation, initially constituted as the 'Central Text Book Committee' and later transformed into the 'Assam State Text Book Production and Publication Corporation Limited'. The Corporation was primarily engaged in research, printing, and publishing of textbooks for school students in Assam. The main issue was whether the Corporation could be considered an 'Educational Institution' under Section 10(22) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the relevant Assessment Years spanning from 1981-1982 to 1996-1997.

The Assessing Officer contended that since the Corporation's income was derived solely from the publication and sale of textbooks, it did not qualify for exemption under Section 10(22) as it did not exist solely for educational purposes. This decision was upheld by the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals). However, the Tribunal, by majority decision, ruled in favor of the Corporation, considering it an Educational Institution eligible for exemption.

The High Court, on appeal by the Department, disagreed with the Tribunal's decision, emphasizing that the Corporation's income was not exempt as it did not exclusively impart education and engaged in profit-earning activities through the publication and sale of textbooks. The Supreme Court noted the historical background of the Corporation's formation, its government ownership, and control by the State of Assam. It highlighted the Corporation's aim to implement the state's education policy and the provision for Return on Investment to the state.

The Supreme Court referred to circulars issued by the Central Board of Direct Taxes granting exemption under Section 10(22) to similar educational bodies in other states. Citing the judgments of the Rajasthan High Court and the Orissa High Court, the Supreme Court concluded that the Corporation should be treated as an Educational Institution entitled to exemption under Section 10(22). The matter was remitted back to the Assessing Officer for reconsideration in light of the precedents and circulars mentioned. The appeals were allowed with no order as to costs.

---