Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether processed knitted fabrics were entitled to exemption under Notification No. 14/2002-CE dated 01/03/2002 despite grey fabrics having been received from another unit without payment of excise duty, in view of Explanation II deeming textile yarns or fabrics to have been duty paid.
Analysis: The exemption was denied on the footing that condition No. 3 required duty-paid input fabrics. However, Explanation II to the notification created a legal fiction that textile yarns or fabrics shall be deemed to have been duty paid even without documentary proof of actual duty payment. The condition was therefore to be read in light of that deeming provision, and the availability of exemption could not be denied merely because the grey fabrics were cleared under the same exemption scheme. The Larger Bench decision in Arvind Products Ltd. and the Supreme Court decision in Sports & Leisure Apparel Ltd. recognized that the notification intended such fabrics to be treated as duty paid for the purpose of the exemption.
Conclusion: The grey fabrics were deemed duty paid, condition No. 3 stood satisfied, and the appellant was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 14/2002-CE.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an exemption notification contains an explanation deeming textile yarns or fabrics to have been duty paid, the beneficiary cannot be denied the exemption on the ground that the input fabrics were not actually duty paid, since the legal fiction must be given full effect.