Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal clarifies exemption criteria for Blue Denim fabric, upholds Commissioner's decision.</h1> <h3>CENTURY DENIM Versus COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, INDORE</h3> The Tribunal held that Blue Denim cloth manufactured using imported Indigo Pure dye does not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 8/97-CE. It ... 100% EOU – exemption - manufacture from DTA / indigenous procured goods – raw material versus consumables – textile industry - held that - Indigo dye, which is very much present in the Blue denim fabrics, though is small quantity (about 1.1%), has to be treated as a raw material, not a consumable - the term ‘consumables’ and ‘raw materials’ are understood in trade parlance, we have to look at the meaning of these terms in Indian trade circle, not in the trade circles of some remote corner of the world - Just because the quantity of Indigo dye present in denim is just 1.1% by weight or cost of Indigo dye is 2% to 2.5% of the production cost of denim fabrics, the Indigo dye will not cease to be a raw material for denim fabrics - benefit of exemption under Notification No. 8/97-CE is not applicable to the DTA clearances of Blue denim cloth in the manufacture of which imported Indigo had been used. Penalty u/s 11AC set arise Issues Involved:1. Eligibility for exemption under Notification No. 8/97-CE.2. Classification of Indigo Pure dye as a raw material or consumable.3. Interpretation of the term 'wholly' in the context of the exemption notification.4. Applicability of extended limitation period and penalties under Section 11AC.Detailed Analysis:1. Eligibility for Exemption under Notification No. 8/97-CE:The primary issue revolves around whether the Blue Denim cloth manufactured by the assessee qualifies for exemption under Notification No. 8/97-CE. This notification exempts finished products manufactured wholly from indigenous raw materials from excess duty. The dispute is whether the use of imported Indigo Pure dye disqualifies the Blue Denim from this exemption.2. Classification of Indigo Pure Dye:The crux of the matter is whether Indigo Pure dye should be classified as a 'raw material' or a 'consumable.' The Tribunal previously ruled in favor of the Revenue, considering Indigo Pure as a raw material essential for manufacturing Blue Denim, thus disqualifying the product from the exemption. The Supreme Court directed a de novo adjudication to reconsider whether Indigo Pure could be classified as a consumable, emphasizing the importance of trade parlance and industry standards.3. Interpretation of 'Wholly':The term 'wholly' in the exemption notification is under scrutiny. The assessee argues that 'wholly' should be interpreted as 'predominantly,' given that Indigo Pure constitutes only 2-2.5% of the production cost and 1.1% of the weight of the denim fabric. However, the Tribunal, referencing Supreme Court judgments, held that 'wholly' means entirely or completely, and thus, any use of imported raw materials, regardless of quantity, disqualifies the product from the exemption.4. Applicability of Extended Limitation Period and Penalties:The extended limitation period and penalties under Section 11AC are relevant for certain appeals where duty was demanded by invoking the proviso to Section 11A(1). The Tribunal found that the assessee's unit was under physical control, and the jurisdictional central excise officers were aware of the use of imported Indigo dye. Hence, the normal limitation period applies, and penalties under Section 11AC are not attracted.Conclusion:The Tribunal concluded that the Blue Denim cloth manufactured using imported Indigo Pure dye does not qualify for exemption under Notification No. 8/97-CE. It upheld the orders rejecting the appeals filed by the assessee and the Revenue. The Tribunal affirmed that Indigo Pure dye is a raw material, not a consumable, and the term 'wholly' in the notification means entirely, not predominantly. The Tribunal also upheld the Commissioner's decision on the normal limitation period and the non-applicability of penalties under Section 11AC.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found