Just a moment...

Top
FeedbackReport
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Feedback/Report an Error
Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By: ?
Even if Sort by Date is selected, exact match will be shown on the top.
RelevanceDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        Note

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Tribunal upholds specific disallowances and additions, partially allows Revenue's appeal.

        The ITO, Ward-2 (1), Kota Versus Shri Babu Lal Somani, Prop. M/s Somani & Company and Somani Carrier

        The ITO, Ward-2 (1), Kota Versus Shri Babu Lal Somani, Prop. M/s Somani & Company and Somani Carrier - Tmi Issues Involved:
        1. Rejection of books of accounts.
        2. Estimation of net profit vis-a-vis specific disallowances/additions.
        3. Suppressed production and unrecorded sales/receipts/income.
        4. Additions under specific heads such as unexplained expenditure, excessive/bogus expenses, and non-deduction of TDS.
        5. Deletion of additions related to unexplained differences in opening balances, lease rent, interest income, and loss in Marble & Granite trading.

        Detailed Analysis:

        1. Rejection of Books of Accounts:
        The primary issue was whether the books of accounts of the assessee were rejected. The CIT(A) held that the AO had, in substance, rejected the books of accounts and should have estimated the income by applying a net profit rate. However, the AO's remand report stated that the regular books were not rejected; additions were made based on impounded documents and irregularities. The tribunal noted that there was no specific finding by the AO about the rejection of books under Section 145(3). The tribunal concluded that the books were not rejected and that the AO had accepted the recorded transactions while adding unrecorded transactions to the income.

        2. Estimation of Net Profit vis-a-vis Specific Disallowances/Additions:
        The CIT(A) estimated the net profit at 10% on undisclosed sales and 9% on disclosed sales, resulting in an addition of Rs. 5,03,251/-. The CIT(A) deleted specific additions made by the AO, stating that once books were rejected, no separate disallowances were justified. The tribunal held that since the books were not rejected, the estimation of net profit was not warranted, and specific disallowances/additions made by the AO were upheld.

        3. Suppressed Production and Unrecorded Sales/Receipts/Income:
        The AO made additions for suppressed production and unrecorded sales. The CIT(A) partially allowed the appeal, estimating suppressed production at 80% and calculating the difference, resulting in an undisclosed turnover of Rs. 36,01,132/-. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s findings, confirming the addition for suppressed production and unrecorded sales.

        4. Additions Under Specific Heads:
        - Unexplained Expenditure (Section 69C): The AO made additions for unexplained expenditure, differences in ledgers, and transportation charges. The tribunal confirmed these additions as the assessee failed to offer any explanation.
        - Non-Deduction of TDS (Section 40(a)(ia)): The AO added Rs. 27,15,203/- for non-deduction of TDS on labor and transportation expenses. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, but the tribunal reinstated it, stating that specific disallowances were justified.
        - Violation of Provisions of Section 40A(3): The AO added Rs. 36,45,562/- for cash payments violating Section 40A(3). The CIT(A) deleted this addition, but the tribunal upheld it, confirming the AO's findings.

        5. Deletion of Additions:
        - Differences in Opening Balances: The AO made a protective addition of Rs. 1,07,656/- for unexplained differences in opening balances. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, and the tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision.
        - Lease Rent: The AO added Rs. 93,000/- for undisclosed lease rent. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, and the tribunal confirmed the CIT(A)'s decision.
        - Interest Income: The AO added Rs. 72,000/- for undisclosed interest income. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, and the tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s decision.
        - Loss in Marble & Granite Trading: The AO added Rs. 1,43,799/- for loss in Marble & Granite trading. The CIT(A) deleted this addition, but the tribunal reinstated it, confirming the AO's findings.

        Conclusion:
        The tribunal partially allowed the Revenue's appeal, confirming the AO's specific disallowances and additions while rejecting the CIT(A)'s estimation of net profit. The tribunal upheld the CIT(A)'s deletion of additions related to differences in opening balances, lease rent, and interest income but reinstated the addition for loss in Marble & Granite trading.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found