Tribunal remands case for jurisdiction determination post-Supreme Court ruling. Assessee's rights and status quo emphasized.

The Tribunal allowed the appeal by remanding the case back to the original adjudicating authority to determine the jurisdiction issue following the Supreme Court's decision. The Tribunal emphasized the importance of ensuring the assessee's right to be heard and maintaining the status quo until a final decision is made.

---

---

Issues:
Jurisdiction of DRI to issue show-cause notice under Customs Act.

Analysis:
The appeal was filed against Order-in-Original No. 6038/2007, where the importer's counsel raised a preliminary plea regarding the jurisdiction of DRI to issue the show-cause notice. The Hon'ble High Court of Delhi had observed in a previous case that DRI was not competent to issue such notices. The assessee-Respondent cited the Supreme Court decision in Commissioner of Customs vs. Sayed Ali, stating that DRI officers were not proper officers under the Customs Act. Subsequently, amendments were made to the Customs Act and a notification was issued assigning the functions of the proper officer to various officers, including Additional Director General, DRI. The issue of DRI officers having proper jurisdiction to issue show-cause notices came up before various High Courts, resulting in conflicting decisions. The matter reached the Supreme Court, which granted a stay on the Delhi High Court's judgment. Another case before the Delhi High Court granted liberty to review the challenge based on the outcome of appeals filed in the Supreme Court. Following the Delhi High Court's decision in a similar case, the Tribunal set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter to the original adjudicating authority to first decide the jurisdiction issue after the Supreme Court's decision and then proceed on the merits, ensuring the assessee's right to be heard. The appeal was allowed by way of remand, maintaining the status quo until a final decision is reached.

---