Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Customs Act penalties analyzed: Singh's set aside, insufficient evidence; Dinesh's upheld; Mili's set aside, lack of proof.</h1> <h3>M/s. Surender Kumar Singh., Milli Khatri & Dinesh Khatri Versus Commissioner of Customs, New Delhi (Icd Tkd)</h3> The penalties imposed under the Customs Act for involvement in the illegal export of red sanders logs were analyzed in this case. Shri Surender Kumar ... Penalties u/s 114 (i)/114AA of the CA, 1962 - smuggling of Red Sanders - penalty on Shri Surender Kumar Singh who was G card holder - Held that: - From the FIR lodged by him, almost four months prior to incident of fraudulent export, it is apparent that he was not instrumental in filing the shipping bill covering the fraudulent export consignment. The inquiry carried out in terms of CHA Regulation also has exonerated Shri Surender Kumar Singh from any involvement in the export fraud. In view of the above, we find no justification for the penalty imposed on Shri Surender Kumar Singh, which is consequently set aside. Penalty on Shri Dinesh Khatri, who was the proprietor of M/s. Khatri Traders, Rohini - it was alleged that he facilitated the storage of contraband goods i.e. red sanders in his godown premises - Held that: - it is clearly evident that Shri Deepak Khatri has played a significant part in fraudulent export of contraband goods by facilitating storing of the same in his godown. Consequently connivance in the illegal export stand established and hence, we find no reason to interfere with the findings and imposition of penalty on Shri Dinesh Khatri. Penalty on Smt. Mili Khatri wife of Shri Dinesh Khatri for abetting the fraudulent export of red sander - Held that: - It is on record that the godown was given on rent to M/s. Khatri Traders which was rented by her husband Shri Dinesh Khatri. From the records, we find no evidence incriminating the role of Ms. Mili Khatri in the fraudulent export of red sanders. Consequently, there is no justification to impose penalty on her and same is set aside. Appeal allowed - decided partly in favor of appellant. Issues:Penalties imposed under section 114(i)/114AA of the Customs Act, 1962 for involvement in the illegal export of red sanders logs.Analysis:1. Shri Surender Kumar Singh:The penalty of Rs. 3,00,000 was imposed on Shri Surender Kumar Singh, the G-card holder of a CHA firm involved in filing the shipping bill for the illegal export of red sanders. The adjudicating authority found that Singh failed to report the misuse of the CHA license, resulting in the unlawful export. However, Singh argued that he had lost his G-card before the incident and submitted an FIR showing his lack of involvement. The inquiry exonerated him, leading to the penalty being set aside due to insufficient evidence linking him to the fraud.2. Shri Dinesh Khatri:A penalty of Rs. 8,00,000 was imposed on Shri Dinesh Khatri, the proprietor of a trading firm where red sanders were found stored during a search. The adjudicating authority held him responsible for facilitating the storage of contraband goods without proper legal documentation. Khatri's defense claimed another individual was the mastermind behind the illegal export, and the penalty was imposed in violation of natural justice. Despite the lack of direct evidence against Khatri, the involvement in storing the contraband goods was established, leading to the penalty being upheld.3. Smt. Mili Khatri:Smt. Mili Khatri, wife of Shri Dinesh Khatri, was penalized Rs. 5,00,000 for abetting the fraudulent export from her rented godown. The adjudicating authority found her complicit in allowing the illegal activities to take place. However, the defense argued that there was no concrete evidence of her active involvement in the illegal export. As the records did not show her direct participation in the fraud, the penalty imposed on her was set aside due to insufficient proof.In conclusion, the appeals were partially allowed, setting aside the penalties on Shri Surender Kumar Singh and Smt. Mili Khatri, while upholding the penalty on Shri Dinesh Khatri for his role in facilitating the storage and illegal export of red sanders logs.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found