Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the appeal involved a substantial question of law on treatment of income as short-term capital gain, long-term capital gain and long-term capital loss; and whether the deletion of disallowance of interest expenditure required interference.
Analysis: The appeal was admitted on the first question relating to characterization of income. On the second question, the advances were found to have been made in connection with business exigencies for facilitating acquisition of assets, and the view taken by the Tribunal that the interest expenditure was not liable to be disallowed was found to call for no interference.
Outcome: The appeal was admitted on the first question, while the second question was not taken up for consideration.