Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an assessee eligible for rural area exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE can decline that benefit and exclude the clearances of goods bearing another person's brand name from the aggregate value for SSI exemption.
Analysis: Paragraph 2(i) of Notification No. 8/2003-CE gives a manufacturer the option not to avail the exemption, but that option operates for the notification as a whole and not in parts. Paragraph 3(a) excludes only those clearances bearing another person's brand name which are themselves ineligible under paragraph 4. Since paragraph 4(c) makes goods manufactured in a rural area eligible for the exemption, such clearances do not fall within the exclusion in paragraph 3(a). The notification therefore cannot be applied selectively by paying duty on branded clearances while ignoring them for computing the aggregate value.
Conclusion: The clearances of goods bearing another person's brand name had to be included in the aggregate value. The assessee was not entitled to exclude them for claiming SSI benefit, and the demand was upheld against the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification that permits an option to forgo the exemption must be applied in its entirety, and clearances that are otherwise eligible for exemption cannot be excluded from the aggregate turnover computation merely because duty was paid on them.