Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the redemption fine and penalties imposed on import of old and used digital multifunction printing and copying machines were liable to be sustained, reduced, or set aside when the enhancement of value was not contested and the goods were not restricted at the relevant time.
Analysis: The appellants did not dispute the enhancement of value and confined the challenge to the redemption fine and penalties. The goods were held to be not restricted under Para 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy at the relevant time, as the restriction on multifunctional digital copiers came into force only in 2012. At the same time, the enhanced value remaining undisturbed justified retention of penal consequences, though not at the levels imposed in the impugned order. The appropriate course was therefore to substantially reduce the redemption fine and penalties.
Conclusion: The redemption fine and penalties were not set aside in full, but were reduced to meet the ends of justice, resulting in partial relief to the appellants.