Just a moment...
Generate professional replies to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Step 1 – Issue Identification & Review
The AI analyses your query, notice, order, or uploaded documents and identifies the key issues involved.
• Review the issues identified by the AI
• Add, edit, remove, or refine issues as required
Step 2 – Draft Generation
Once you approve the issues, the AI performs issue-wise legal research and prepares a structured draft response.
• Relevant statutory provisions
• Judicial precedents and Supreme Court, High Court and other citations
• Issue-wise legal analysis
• Practical arguments and supporting content
• Professionally structured draft ready for further review. 
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the complaint case and the FIR case were required to be clubbed under Section 210 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and whether the impugned order refusing clubbing called for interference in proceedings under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.
Analysis: Section 210 applies only where, during inquiry or trial in a complaint case, an investigation by the police is in progress in relation to the same offence. The record showed that the police had already filed the final report under Section 173 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 before the complaint was filed, and thus no police investigation was pending when the complaint proceedings commenced. The complaint and the FIR case were also found to relate to different offences and could not be tried together on that basis.
Conclusion: Section 210 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 was not applicable, clubbing was rightly refused, and the petition for quashing was dismissed.