Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
By Case ID:

When case Id is present, search is done only for this

Sort By:
RelevanceDefaultDate
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal allows appeal for service tax benefit denial under Notification No.1/2006-ST</h1> <h3>Freewill Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Versus Commissioner of Central Excise, Pune</h3> The appeal was partly allowed as the Tribunal set aside the demand for service tax benefit denial under Notification No.1/2006-ST for completion and ... Completion and finishing activity - benefit of N/N. 1/2006-ST dt. 1.3.2006 - activity of laying of synthetic/wooden flooring in various sports stadium - Whether the benefit of CENVAT Credit can be extended to the appellant in case they are denied the benefit of N/N. 1/2006-ST.? - Held that: - In the event that the benefit of notification No. 1/2006-ST is denied the appellants would be clearly entitled to the cenvat credit irrespective of the fact that they have not claim it earlier while claiming benefit of Notification No. 1/2006-ST. The demand confirmed on this is therefore set aside and matter remanded to the original adjudicating authority to examine the detail account submitted by the appellant - matter on remand. Whether appellant are liable to service tax in respect of services provided to Shri Sathya Sai Health and Education Trust, Government of Maharashtra in respect of Balewadi Stadium for Commonwealth Youth Games and Delhi Development Authority? - Held that: - Tribunal in the case of Anand Construction Co. [2013 (3) TMI 250 - CESTAT MUMBAI] relying on the Circular No. 80/10/2004-ST dt. 17.9.2004 held that no tax can be demanded under the head of commercial or industrial construction in respect of services provided for construction of sports complex for Government of India and for charitable institution - appeal allowed. Appeal allowed in part and part matter on remand. Issues involved:1. Benefit of Cenvat Credit denial and imposition of penalty by lower authorities.2. Demand of service tax for completion and finishing services provided to various entities.Analysis:Issue 1: Benefit of Cenvat Credit denial and penalty impositionThe appellant, engaged in providing Commercial or Industrial Construction Services and Business Auxiliary Service, appealed against the demand confirmation and penalty imposition by lower authorities. The first issue raised was regarding the denial of service tax benefit under Notification No.1/2006-ST for completion and finishing services. The Revenue alleged that the appellants were not entitled to this benefit as they were only providing completion and finishing services, not covered under the notification. The appellant argued that if denied this benefit, they should be allowed Cenvat Credit for the materials used. The Commissioner denied this credit citing trading activities and lack of separate accounts. However, the appellant presented detailed accounts to the Tribunal, demonstrating maintenance of stock registers and bill reconciliations. The Tribunal set aside the demand, remanding the matter to the original authority for a detailed examination of the Cenvat Credit availability.Issue 2: Demand of service tax for completion and finishing servicesThe second issue pertained to the demand of service tax for services provided to various entities like the Government of Maharashtra, Delhi Development Authority, and Shri Sathya Sai Health & Education Trust. The appellant argued that the services provided for non-commercial purposes, such as sports stadium construction, should not be taxed under Commercial or Industrial Construction Service. They relied on circulars and tribunal decisions to support their stance. The CBEC clarified that tax liability depends on whether the construction is used for commerce or industry, exempting constructions for non-profit purposes. The Tribunal, citing previous judgments, held that services provided for public benefit, like sports complexes, are non-commercial constructions and exempt from service tax. Consequently, the demand of service tax for services provided to the mentioned entities was set aside.In conclusion, the appeal was partly allowed and partly remanded to the original adjudicating authority for further examination.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found