Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the assessee was entitled to SSI exemption under Notification No. 8/2003-CE despite availing CENVAT credit on inputs and reversing 10% of the value of exempt clearances under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
Analysis: The exemption notification was conditional upon not availing CENVAT credit. The assessee had availed credit on common inputs used for both branded and own-brand clearances. Reversal of an amount under Rule 6(3)(b) of the CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 could not be imported into or substituted for the specific condition in the exemption notification. The applicable exemption scheme required strict compliance with its own terms, and the assessees who choose the full exemption route cannot simultaneously retain the benefit of input credit in the manner attempted here.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to the SSI exemption benefit and the demand was sustainable.
Ratio Decidendi: A conditional SSI exemption requiring non-availment of CENVAT credit is unavailable where credit on common inputs has been availed, and reversal under the CENVAT Credit Rules does not cure non-compliance with the notification condition.