Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Tribunal allows full TDS credit on unrealized rent income, overturns lower authorities' decisions.</h1> The Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing full credit for Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on unrealized rent. It held that TDS credit should be ... Rectification of mistake - not allowing the TDS credit - Held that:- The assessee duly fulfills all the conditions as laid down in section 198 r.ws. 199 r.w. Rule 378A of the Act. As find that TDS had been deducted and paid to the Central Government by the deductee and Payment/ Credit of Rent Income has been included in the accounts of the assessee. The deductor had duly filed requisite TDS returns as per Rules and also issued TDS certificate to the assessee and the same was furnished to the AO. Amount of TDS claimed, corresponding to claim of unrealized rent, is duly offered to tax as income of the assessee, in view of section 198 of the Act and also assessed by the AO. As assessee's action is in accordance with provisions of section 199 of the Act and the assessee is eligible for seeking credit of the TDS amount. Hence, set aside the order of the authorities below and decide the issue in favour of the assessee. However, this issue is highly debatable and cannot be acted upon by the revenue - Decided in favour of assessee. Issues Involved:1. Legality of the assessment order passed under section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.2. Entitlement to credit for Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) on unrealized rent.Detailed Analysis:1. Legality of the Assessment Order Passed under Section 154 of the Income Tax Act, 1961:The assessee challenged the assessment order passed by the AO under section 154, arguing that it was 'bad in law' and should be quashed. The AO had rectified the assessment order by restricting the allowance of TDS credit to the extent of the actual amount of rent received, rather than the total rent including unrealized rent. The CIT(A) upheld the AO's decision, stating that the AO had 'rightly given the proportionate claim of TDS credit' based on the provisions of section 199(3) read with Rule 37BB (3)(i)/(ii). The CIT(A) noted that since the unrealized rent had not been assessed to tax, the TDS deducted on such rent could not be claimed as tax deducted and paid to the central government.The Tribunal, however, found that the issue was highly debatable and could not be rectified under section 154 of the Act. The Tribunal referred to the Supreme Court decision in T.S. Balram, ITO vs. Volkart Bros., which held that a mistake apparent on the record must be an 'obvious and patent mistake' and not something that requires a long drawn process of reasoning. The Tribunal concluded that the AO was 'wholly wrong in holding that there was a mistake apparent from the record.'2. Entitlement to Credit for TDS on Unrealized Rent:The assessee claimed full credit for TDS of Rs. 5,86,412, but the AO allowed credit of only Rs. 2,70,411 based on the rental income actually received. The assessee argued that the entire amount of TDS should be credited as the total rental income, including unrealized rent, was offered to tax. The Tribunal agreed with the assessee, stating that 'the Unrealized rent is deduction which is claimed u/s 23(1) of the Act, read with Rule 4 of the Rules, from the total rental income offered during the year.' The Tribunal emphasized that the unrealized rent is not an exempt income and that the TDS credit needs to be allowed on the total rental income offered to tax.The Tribunal referred to section 198 of the Act, which states that all sums deducted shall be deemed to be income received for the purpose of computing the income of an assessee. The Tribunal also cited section 199 of the Act and Rule 37BA, which provide that TDS credit should be given for the assessment year in which such income is assessable. The Tribunal noted that the assessee fulfilled all conditions laid down in section 198 r.w.s. 199 r.w. Rule 37BA.The Tribunal also cited the decision of the co-ordinate bench in the case of Chandrashekar Agarwal, which held that an assessee is entitled to credit for TDS once such income is included in his income, even if the remaining amount is taxable in succeeding years. The Tribunal concluded that the assessee's action was in accordance with the provisions of section 199 of the Act and that the assessee was eligible for credit of the entire TDS amount.Conclusion:The Tribunal set aside the orders of the authorities below and decided the issue in favor of the assessee, allowing the appeal. The Tribunal held that the issue was highly debatable and could not be acted upon by the revenue under section 154 of the Act. The Tribunal pronounced the order in the open court on 09-06-2017.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found