Section 14A disallowance cannot exceed exempt income actually earned; the Tribunal deleted the addition.

Disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D is confined to expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income and cannot exceed the exempt income actually earned. The assessee had earned exempt income and already accounted for it in its computation, so the Tribunal held that no further disallowance beyond that amount was justified. Applying Delhi High Court rulings on the scope of section 14A and rule 8D, the entire addition was deleted and the assessee succeeded on the sole issue.

---

---

Issues: Whether disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D could exceed the amount of exempt income earned by the assessee.

Analysis: The assessee had earned exempt income of Rs. 1,75,063 during the relevant assessment year and had already considered that amount in its computation. The appellate authorities had adopted differing approaches to the disallowance, but the controlling principle applied was that section 14A permits disallowance only of expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income. Once the exempt income itself had been accounted for, no further disallowance beyond that income was justified. The Tribunal relied on the Delhi High Court rulings holding that section 14A and rule 8D cannot be used to disallow an amount in excess of the exempt income actually earned.

Conclusion: The disallowance could not exceed the exempt income and the entire addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.

Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the sole issue decided, and the Revenue's cross appeal failed.

Ratio Decidendi: Disallowance under section 14A read with rule 8D is confined to expenditure incurred in relation to exempt income and cannot be made in excess of the exempt income actually earned.

---