TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Tribunal Upholds Interest Order on Differential Duty for Electric Meters</h1> <h3>M/s. United Electrical Industries Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Kollam</h3> M/s. United Electrical Industries Versus Commissioner of Central Excise & Customs, Kollam - TMI Issues:- Appeals against rejection of appeals by Commissioner (A) and demand of interest under Section 11 of Central Excise Act, 1944 on differential duty paid.Analysis:The appellants, a manufacturing unit owned by the Government of Kerala, filed three appeals against the Commissioner (A)'s order rejecting their appeals and upholding the demand of interest on the differential duty paid. The appellant manufactures electric meters cleared to Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) based on a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU). The purchase orders from KSEB allowed for price revisions, leading to supplementary invoices for differential price and duty. The appellants paid the differential duty but not the interest on it. The Commissioner (A) upheld the demand of interest under Section 11 of the Central Excise Act, citing the Supreme Court judgment in SKF India Ltd. The appellant argued that the order lacked consideration of material, issuance of show-cause notice, and was time-barred. They contended that the price escalation was due to a government decision, paid the differential duty promptly, and there was no allegation of fraud. The appellant also disputed the application of the SKF India Ltd. judgment, claiming it did not discuss the limitation under Section 11A of the Act.The AR argued that the issue was settled by the Supreme Court in the SKF India Ltd. case, where it was held that interest is payable on differential duty due to price variations. The Tribunal, after hearing both parties and examining the records, found the Commissioner (A)'s order aligned with the SKF India Ltd. judgment. The Tribunal upheld the order, stating that the issue was conclusively in favor of the Revenue, and dismissed all three appeals. The decision was pronounced on 07/06/2017.
TaxTMI 