Clandestine removal disguised as replacement and return documents sustained duty demand and penalties on factual findings.

Clearance documents and delivery challans described goods as free replacements, rectified and returned, short-supplied, sent as it is, and samples, but the investigation found separate internal identification markings and no satisfactory proof of genuine returns, rectification, or corresponding short supply. On those facts, the disputed descriptions were treated as camouflage for clandestine removal of excisable goods without payment of duty. The duty demand and consequential penalties were therefore sustained, and the order dropping the demands was set aside.

---

---

Issues: Whether the demand of duty and penalties could be sustained where goods were shown as free replacement, rectified and returned, short-supplied, sent as it is and samples, but the investigation indicated clandestine clearance without payment of duty.

Analysis: The investigation disclosed separate clearance documents and delivery challans marked for internal identification, while the description in those documents showed the goods as free replacements, rectified and returned, short-supplied and similar categories. The record did not contain satisfactory documentary support to show genuine return for rectification or actual short supply corresponding to the original clearances. The appellate authority had dropped major portions of the demand without detailed justification, treating the matter as one of procedural irregularity. On the facts found by the Revenue, the disputed descriptions were only a camouflage for clandestine removal of excisable goods.

Conclusion: The duty demand and consequential penalties were held to be sustainable and the order dropping the demands was set aside.

---