1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>CESTAT ALLAHABAD: ROM Application Dismissed on Export Proceeds Date Error</h1> The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD dismissed the Revenue's ROM Application seeking rectification of a mistake in a Final Order regarding the date of ... Rectification of mistake - Held that: - the contentions in the said Para 5 of ROM Application are totally wrong when compared with the record as reflected in above stated Para 13 of appeal memorandum, so far as they related to allegations made against the counsel & facts on record. I, therefore, hold that there was no apparent mistake of facts on the face of record - application for ROM dismissed. Issues involved:Rectification of mistake in Final Order No. A/70760-70761/2016-SM(BR) dated 31/08/2016 regarding the date of realization of export proceeds in refund claims.Analysis:The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT ALLAHABAD heard the Revenue's ROM Application requesting to rectify a mistake in Final Order No. A/70760-70761/2016-SM(BR) dated 31/08/2016. The mistake pertained to the date of realization of export proceeds in refund claims filed by M/s Contata Solutions Pvt. Ltd. The ld. Counsel for the company pointed out discrepancies in the ROM Application regarding the dates of realization of export proceeds. The Tribunal noted that the ROM Application was filed in one appeal only and any references to other appeals were to be disregarded. The Final Order had previously mentioned the dates of receipt of foreign exchange in line with the appeal memorandum. The Tribunal reviewed the facts and found that the contentions in the ROM Application were incorrect when compared to the appeal memorandum. It was concluded that there was no apparent mistake of facts on record, and the Final Order aligned with the information in the appeal memorandum. Consequently, the Tribunal dismissed the application for rectification of mistake.This judgment clarifies the importance of aligning facts presented in applications with the records on appeal. It emphasizes the need for accuracy and consistency in submissions before the Tribunal. The decision highlights the Tribunal's role in ensuring the integrity of the legal process and discouraging baseless allegations against counsel. The judgment reaffirms the principle that rectification of mistakes should be based on genuine discrepancies in the record, rather than unsubstantiated claims.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
