TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Court orders 3rd respondent to provide order copy within 2 weeks, petitioner must explain appeal delay</h1> <h3>Sree Krishna Power Engineering & Consultancy Private Limited Versus The Commissioner of Service Tax, The Additional Commissioner of Service Tax, The Assistant Commissioner of Service Tax</h3> Sree Krishna Power Engineering & Consultancy Private Limited Versus The Commissioner of Service Tax, The Additional Commissioner of Service Tax, The ... Issues involved:1. Petitioner aggrieved against the order of the 3rd respondent for refusing to furnish a copy of the order passed by the 2nd respondent.2. Dispute regarding whether the order was served on the petitioner.3. Court's decision on providing a copy of the order and addressing the issue of limitation for filing an appeal.Analysis:1. The petitioner challenged the order of the 3rd respondent, who refused to provide a copy of the order passed by the 2nd respondent. The petitioner claimed that they were not served with the said order, leading to a dispute over the receipt of the order.2. The Court refrained from delving into the question of whether the order was served on the petitioner, stating that such a matter should be addressed during an appeal before the Appellate Authority, especially if the appeal is filed with a delay. The focus was on the need for the 3rd respondent to furnish a copy of the order in question.3. The Court directed the 3rd respondent to provide a copy of the order within two weeks, emphasizing that this directive does not exempt the petitioner from explaining any delay in filing an appeal. The judgment highlighted that the provision of the order copy is separate from the petitioner's obligation to address any delay in the appeal process, thereby concluding the case without imposing any costs.This detailed analysis encapsulates the key issues raised in the judgment and the Court's decision regarding the dispute over the order copy and the related implications for the appeal process.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
