Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        whatsappJoin Channel
        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (5) TMI 675 - AT - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Penalty proceedings under Section 271AAB invalidated for procedural flaws and natural justice violation The Tribunal invalidated penalty proceedings under section 271AAB due to procedural flaws, lack of satisfaction recording, natural justice violation, and ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Penalty proceedings under Section 271AAB invalidated for procedural flaws and natural justice violation

                          The Tribunal invalidated penalty proceedings under section 271AAB due to procedural flaws, lack of satisfaction recording, natural justice violation, and inadequate notice. Consequently, the imposed penalty of Rs. 40,00,000 was quashed, and the appeals were allowed. The order was pronounced on January 30, 2017, in favor of the assessees.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Confirmation of penalty under section 271AAB of the Income-tax Act, 1961.
                          2. Definition and applicability of "undisclosed income" under section 271AAB.
                          3. Requirement of recording satisfaction by the Assessing Officer for initiating penalty.
                          4. Principles of natural justice and adequate opportunity of being heard.
                          5. Validity and specificity of penalty notice issued under section 271AAB.

                          Issue-Wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Confirmation of Penalty under Section 271AAB:
                          The core issue in these appeals is the sustenance of the penalty of Rs. 40,00,000 levied under section 271AAB of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The penalty was imposed following a search and seizure operation on October 24, 2013, where undisclosed income was found and surrendered. The Assessing Officer imposed the penalty on the grounds that the surrendered income was undisclosed and that the conditions of section 271AAB were met.

                          2. Definition and Applicability of "Undisclosed Income":
                          The appellants argued that the income surrendered was duly recorded in a diary and related to the assessment year 2014-15, and thus, did not fall under the definition of "undisclosed income" as per clause (c) of the Explanation below sub-section (3) of section 271AAB. The Tribunal noted that the term "undisclosed income" is critical in determining the applicability of the penalty under section 271AAB.

                          3. Requirement of Recording Satisfaction by the Assessing Officer:
                          The appellants contended that no penalty notice was issued during the course of assessment, and the penalty was not initiated during the assessment proceedings. The Tribunal observed that the penalty was initiated by a notice under section 274 read with section 271(1)(c), not under section 271AAB, which was a significant procedural lapse. The Tribunal emphasized that recording satisfaction is essential for the validity of penalty imposition under section 271AAB, drawing parallels with the Supreme Court's decision in CIT v. Jai Laxmi Rice Mills [2015] 379 ITR 521 (SC).

                          4. Principles of Natural Justice and Adequate Opportunity of Being Heard:
                          The appellants argued that the Assessing Officer did not provide a reasonable opportunity of being heard, violating the principles of natural justice. The Tribunal agreed, noting that the notice was issued on September 23, 2015, received on September 24, 2015, with only two working days given for response before the hearing on September 28, 2015. The Tribunal highlighted that the principles of natural justice require a fair and reasonable opportunity to be given, which was not adhered to in this case.

                          5. Validity and Specificity of Penalty Notice Issued under Section 271AAB:
                          The Tribunal found that the notice issued under section 271(1)(c) did not specify the charge under section 271AAB, which involves different penalties (10%, 20%, 30%) based on the nature of the undisclosed income. The lack of specificity and clarity in the notice rendered the penalty proceedings invalid. The Tribunal also noted that section 271AAB uses the word "may," indicating discretionary power for the Assessing Officer to levy or not levy the penalty, contrary to the mandatory interpretation suggested by the revenue.

                          Conclusion:
                          The Tribunal concluded that the penalty proceedings under section 271AAB were invalid due to the lack of proper initiation, failure to record satisfaction, violation of natural justice, and inadequate notice. Consequently, the penalty imposed was quashed, and the appeals were allowed.

                          Order Pronouncement:
                          The order was pronounced in the open court on January 30, 2017, allowing all the appeals of the assessees.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found