1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule β now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available


2. New: βIn Favour Ofβ filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws β
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>High Court overturns Tribunal, remands penalty decision under Income Tax Act for fresh review.</h1> The High Court of Punjab and Haryana allowed the revenue's appeal against the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal's decision to delete a penalty imposed under ... Penalty u/s 271(1)(c) β retrospective amendment β insertion of Explanation 4 - The assessee declared loss but during assessment, the Assessing Officer did not accept the extent of loss claimed and addition was made to the income. Proceedings were also initiated for penalty. Finally, penalty was levied β ITAT set aside the penalties β matter remanded to ITAT The High Court of Punjab and Haryana heard an appeal by the revenue against a decision made by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The appeal was in reference to a penalty imposed under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 1995-96. The Tribunal had deleted the penalty, citing a judgment in Virtual Soft Systems Ltd v. CIT, which was subsequently overruled by the Supreme Court in Commissioner of Income Tax v. Gold Coin Health Food Pvt Ltd. The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the Tribunal's order, and remanded the matter back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision. The tax effect involved in the case was Rs.10,70,000, exceeding the monetary limits for filing an appeal before the High Court. The parties were directed to appear before the Tribunal for further proceedings on 7.12.2009.