Assembly of computers at site can amount to manufacture when complete systems are supplied under contractual control, with duty upheld.

Assembly and supply of computers at site was treated as manufacture of complete computer systems where the contract and records showed control over assembling and supply of finished systems. The goods acquired a distinct identity as computer systems classifiable under Chapter 8471, and the appellant was regarded as the manufacturer under section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Duty demand and interest were therefore upheld, while the separate Rule 173Q penalty was found unwarranted on the recorded facts and was set aside. The decision leaves the section 11AC penalty undisturbed.

---

---

Issues: (i) whether assembly and supply of computers at site amounted to manufacture of complete computer systems classifiable under Chapter 8471 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, with duty demand and interest sustainable under the Central Excise Act, 1944; (ii) whether penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was sustainable.

Issue (i): whether assembly and supply of computers at site amounted to manufacture of complete computer systems classifiable under Chapter 8471 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, with duty demand and interest sustainable under the Central Excise Act, 1944

Analysis: The contract and contemporaneous records showed that the appellant was obligated to supply completed computer systems, and the evidence established that the appellant controlled the assembling activity and supplied complete systems, whether assembled at its premises or at the schools. The goods acquired a distinct identity and were classifiable as computer systems under Chapter 8471, with section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 treating the appellant as the manufacturer. The reliance on precedents concerning exclusion of peripheral components or software value was found inapposite on the facts. The circular relating to plant and machinery at site was also held not applicable.

Conclusion: The duty demand and interest were upheld, and the appellant failed on the classification and manufacture issue.

Issue (ii): whether penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was sustainable

Analysis: The appellant's conduct justified penalty under section 11AC of the Central Excise Act, 1944, but the separate penalty imposed under Rule 173Q was not warranted in the same manner on the facts recorded in the order.

Conclusion: The penalty under Rule 173Q of the Central Excise Rules, 1944 was set aside.

Final Conclusion: The appeal succeeded only to the limited extent of deletion of the Rule 173Q penalty, while the duty demand, interest, and penalty under section 11AC remained undisturbed.

Ratio Decidendi: Assembly of components into complete computer systems under contractual control amounts to manufacture where the finished product has a distinct identity and is supplied as a complete dutiable system.

---