TaxTMI Login
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Just a moment...
AI OCR ✕Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 11 when its activities and receipts from seminars, advertisements, delegate fees and other income brought it within the mischief of the proviso to section 2(15); (ii) Whether the receipts from subscriptions, delegate fees and allied activities were exempt on the principle of mutuality.
Issue (i): Whether the assessee was entitled to exemption under section 11 when its activities and receipts from seminars, advertisements, delegate fees and other income brought it within the mischief of the proviso to section 2(15).
Analysis: The assessee's objects were examined against its actual year-wise receipts and expenditure. The receipts from seminars, delegate fees, advertisements, interest and miscellaneous income were substantial, and the seminar-related activity was found to be the predominant activity during the relevant year rather than merely incidental to the stated objects. On those facts, the activity was held to fall within the statutory exclusion for advancement of an object of general public utility involving trade, commerce, business, or services in relation thereto, and the receipts exceeded the monetary threshold then applicable under the proviso.
Conclusion: The assessee was not entitled to exemption under section 11 for the relevant year.
Issue (ii): Whether the receipts from subscriptions, delegate fees and allied activities were exempt on the principle of mutuality.
Analysis: Mutuality was rejected because the relevant receipts were not confined exclusively to members. The income included amounts from non-members and from activities having an independent revenue character, including seminars, advertisements and interest on investments. In those circumstances, the necessary identity between contributors and participators was absent.
Conclusion: The principle of mutuality did not apply.
Final Conclusion: The assessee's claim for charitable exemption and mutuality-based exemption failed, and the disallowance made by the lower authorities was sustained.
Ratio Decidendi: Where an entity claiming charitable exemption under the head of general public utility carries on substantial revenue-generating activities that are predominant in the relevant year and its receipts are not confined to members, the proviso to section 2(15) applies and mutuality is unavailable.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
