Tribunal directs reassessment of disallowed TDR amount, emphasizing evidence and fresh assessment

The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing the Assessing Officer to reconsider the disallowance of the amount written off towards transferable development rights. The Tribunal found merit in the appellant's argument that the TDR was brought into the firm as capital contribution and treated as stock in trade before being written off. It emphasized the need for a fresh assessment based on the evidence provided by the assessee, setting aside the First Appellate Authority's decision for lack of proper consideration of the documents related to TDR.

---

---

Issues:
Appeal against disallowance of amount written off towards transferable development rights.

Analysis:
The appellant, engaged in the business of builder and property development, filed an appeal against the disallowance of Rs. 12,87,085 written off towards 380 sq.ft of transferable development rights (TDR) for the assessment year 2010-11. The Assessing Officer (AO) disallowed the amount as the TDR was not recovered and had become bad. The AO considered the withholding of TDR as penal in nature and assessed the total income at Rs. 12,10,701 by disallowing the TDR written off. The First Appellate Authority (FAA) upheld the AO's order, stating that the appellant failed to substantiate the claim of business loss arising from the write-off. The appellant contended that the TDR was allocated to another entity and brought into the firm as capital contribution, which was shown as stock in trade before being written off. The appellant argued that the TDR could not be recovered, hence rightfully written off. The appellant requested the allowance of the write-off. The Tribunal found merit in the arguments presented by the appellant's representative and disagreed with the FAA's conclusion. The Tribunal held that the TDR was brought into the firm as capital contribution by a partner and was treated as stock in trade before being written off. However, considering that the documents related to TDR were not before the AO, the Tribunal set aside the FAA's order and directed the AO to reconsider the issue with fair hearing and verification of the claim based on the provided evidence. The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, emphasizing the need for a fresh assessment by the AO based on the available material and evidence supplied by the assessee.

This detailed analysis of the judgment highlights the key legal issues, arguments presented by the parties, the reasoning of the authorities involved, and the final decision of the Tribunal, providing a comprehensive understanding of the case.

---