Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether CENVAT credit on steel items used in fabrication of parts of a boiler and DM plant was admissible as capital goods, and whether the Larger Bench ruling in Vandana Global applied to deny such credit.
Analysis: The steel items were found to have been used in fabrication of parts of the boiler and DM plant, not for creating a structural support for erection of plant and machinery. The factual matrix was therefore materially different from the situation considered in Vandana Global. The period in dispute also preceded the retrospective amendment relied upon in that decision, and the subsequent judicial view recognised that the amendment to the definition of inputs could not be applied retrospectively. On that basis, the Larger Bench ruling was held inapplicable to the present facts.
Conclusion: The credit was held admissible and the assessee's claim was upheld.