Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether fee paid under an engineering service agreement for project engineering, product engineering, training, and plant set-up and commissioning was includible in the assessable value of imported goods as a condition of sale or technical know-how fee.
Analysis: The fee was not shown to be linked to the sale of the imported die set and printer, nor was there evidence of transfer of technology, patents, know-how, or any licence making the import of the goods conditional upon payment of the amount. The agreement, read as a whole, related to services for setting up, commissioning, and operating the plant in India, which were post-importation activities. The legal principles applied in the earlier Supreme Court decisions on customs valuation required a direct nexus with the imported goods and a sale-condition payment before inclusion in the customs assessable value. On the facts, the service fee was separately referable to post-import services and could not be treated as part of the price of the imported goods.
Conclusion: The amount was not includible in the assessable value, and the order excluding it was correct; the Revenue's appeal failed.
Ratio Decidendi: Payments for technical or engineering services that are independently contracted for post-importation set-up, commissioning, or operation of a plant, and are not a condition of sale of the imported goods, are not includible in the customs assessable value.