Just a moment...
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the redemption fine and penalty imposed on import of multifunctional devices were justified in view of the timing of the purchase order, shipment and subsequent restriction under paragraph 2.17 of the Foreign Trade Policy, 2009-2014.
Analysis: The goods had been ordered and received in the port before the amendment restricting import of such devices came into force. In these circumstances, the imposition of a very high penalty was held to be unwarranted. The declared value and enhanced value also indicated that the redemption fine could be moderated. The relief was therefore tailored to the facts by reducing both components of the punishment.
Conclusion: The redemption fine and penalty were reduced to Rs. 3,15,000 and Rs. 15,000 respectively, giving partial relief to the appellant.