TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
When case Id is present, search is done only for this
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>Supreme Court Orders Auction of Sahara Group Properties with Specific Conditions</h1> <h3>S.E.B.I. Versus SAHARA INDIA REAL ESTATE CORPN. LTD. AND ORS.</h3> S.E.B.I. Versus SAHARA INDIA REAL ESTATE CORPN. LTD. AND ORS. - TMI Issues:1. Contempt of court - direction to file list of properties for public auction2. Classification of properties into encumbered and free from encumbrances3. Authorization to sell specific properties and deposit proceeds with SEBI4. Dispute regarding compensation for acquired land at Ghaziabad5. Notice to Ghaziabad Development Authority for hearing6. Proposal for purchase of Plaza Hotel stake by MG Capital Holdings LLCAnalysis:1. The Supreme Court directed the contemnor to provide a list of properties for public auction, emphasizing they should be free from encumbrances. The list included both encumbered and unencumbered properties, with a specific mention of properties in Part 'A' deemed free from encumbrances.2. Notable properties in Part 'A' included Sahara Hospital in Lucknow, Sahara City Homes in various locations, and a stake in Orange India Holdings Sarl, among others. The court excluded an immovable property from auction and addressed compensation issues for a property in Ghaziabad, directing further hearings and computations.3. The court discussed the challenges faced in conducting auctions for certain properties and permitted the contemnor to sell specified properties, excluding encumbered ones. A deposit of a specified amount was mandated to be made to SEBI Sahara Refund Account by a set deadline, with provisions for extension based on compliance.4. Regarding the compensation for the land in Ghaziabad, the court directed notice to be issued to the Ghaziabad Development Authority for a hearing and computation of the awarded compensation. The authority was required to be present before the court on a specified date.5. An unexpected proposal for the purchase of a stake in Plaza Hotel at New York by MG Capital Holdings LLC was presented. The court set conditions for due diligence and financial preparedness, including a substantial deposit and verification of the company's credentials before granting permission.6. The interim order from a previous hearing was to remain in effect until the next hearing date, ensuring continuity in the proceedings and decisions made by the court.
TaxTMI 