CESTAT Chennai: Service Tax Credit Allowed for Telephones at Executives' Homes

The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai allowed the appeal filed by M/s. ITC Ltd. regarding the availment of service tax credit for mobile phones and telephones installed at the residential premises of its executives. The Tribunal held that the telephones used by executives constituted input services related to manufacturing excisable goods, contrary to the original authority's decision. Citing relevant case laws, the Tribunal found the impugned order inconsistent with legal provisions and supported the admissibility of service tax credit for telephone services used by staff at their residences, ultimately vacating the original order and allowing the appeal.

---

---

Issues:
1. Availment of service tax credit for mobile phones and telephones installed at residential premises.
2. Contravention of Rules 3 and 4 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004.
3. Applicability of Circular No. 59/08/2003-S.T.
4. Admissibility of service tax credit for telephone services used by executives.

Analysis:

1. The issue in this case revolves around the availment of service tax credit by M/s. ITC Ltd. for mobile phones and telephones installed at the residential premises of its executives during a specific period. The Circular No. 59/08/2003-S.T. clarified that credit of service tax was allowed only on telephone sets installed in business premises, not for mobile phones. The original authority alleged contravention of Rules 3 and 4 of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004, demanding a specific amount and imposing penalties.

2. The Commissioner (A) affirmed the original authority's decision, except for the penalty, stating that the telephones used by executives were not input services related to manufacturing excisable goods. Despite the potential business facilitation, the phones were considered perquisites by the management. The argument regarding the circular's applicability during the currency of CCR, 2002, which was superseded by CCR, 2004, was rejected.

3. The learned counsel for the appellants cited various case laws to support their argument, emphasizing the approval of service tax credit for mobile and landline phones used for business purposes at executives' residences. The impugned order was found inconsistent with legal provisions based on the case laws presented, leading to the appeal being allowed.

4. The judgment highlighted the decisions in previous cases, such as Excel Crop Care Ltd., Indian Rayon & Industries Ltd., Grasim Industries, Keltech Energies Ltd., and Brakes India Ltd., where service tax credit for telephone services used by staff at their residences was deemed admissible. The Tribunal's decisions supported the admissibility of such credits as input services, ultimately leading to the vacating of the impugned order and allowing the appeal.

This detailed analysis of the judgment provides a comprehensive understanding of the legal issues, arguments presented, and the final decision reached by the Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Chennai.

---