Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether an advance licence issued under paragraph 4.1.7A of the Export and Import Policy 2002-2007 was entitled to exemption from anti-dumping duty under Notification No. 43/2002-Cus. dated 19.4.2002, and whether Notification No. 56/2003-Cus. dated 1.4.2003 was redundant.
Analysis: The advance licence held by the importer was issued under paragraph 4.1.7A, which was a distinct scheme for annual requirement imports. Notification No. 43/2002-Cus. was framed for advance licences under paragraph 4.1.1 and granted exemption from basic customs duty, additional duty, safeguard duty and anti-dumping duty. Notification No. 56/2003-Cus. was a later and separate notification specifically governing advance licences under paragraph 4.1.7A and granting customs duty exemption on imports made thereagainst. The two notifications operated in different fields and the office memorandum of the DGFT did not amend the customs notification or extend the benefit of Notification No. 43/2002-Cus. to paragraph 4.1.7A licences.
Conclusion: The importer was not entitled to anti-dumping duty exemption under Notification No. 43/2002-Cus. for a licence issued under paragraph 4.1.7A, and the challenge to Notification No. 56/2003-Cus. failed.
Ratio Decidendi: An exemption notification must be applied according to its express scope, and a licence-holder can claim only the benefit attached to the specific licence category and notification governing that category.