Just a moment...

Top
Help
AI OCR

Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page

Try Now
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal / NCLT & Others
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
In Favour Of: New
---- In Favour Of ----
  • ---- In Favour Of ----
  • Assessee
  • In favour of Assessee
  • Partly in favour of Assessee
  • Revenue
  • In favour of Revenue
  • Partly in favour of Revenue
  • Appellant / Petitioner
  • In favour of Appellant
  • In favour of Petitioner
  • In favour of Respondent
  • Partly in favour of Appellant
  • Partly in favour of Petitioner
  • Others
  • Neutral (alternate remedy)
  • Neutral (Others)
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court.
Eg: Madhya Pradesh, Orissa, Hyderabad

Use comma for multiple locations.

AY/FY: New?
Enter only the year or year range (e.g., 2025, 2025–26, or 2025–2026).
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:

---------------- For section wise search only -----------------


Statute Type: ?
This filter alone wont work. 1st select a law > statute > section from below filter
New
---- All Statutes----
  • ---- All Statutes ----
  • Select the law first, to see the statutes list
Sections: ?
Select a statute to see the list of sections here
New
---- All Sections ----
  • ---- All Sections ----
  • Select the statute first, to see the sections list

Accuracy Level ~ 90%



TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        2017 (2) TMI 722 - HC - Income Tax

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        Beneficiary shares determinable per Trust Deed, income taxed in beneficiary's hands. The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that the beneficiaries' shares were determinable based on the Trust Deed, leading to the income being taxed ...
                      Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.

                          Beneficiary shares determinable per Trust Deed, income taxed in beneficiary's hands.

                          The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision that the beneficiaries' shares were determinable based on the Trust Deed, leading to the income being taxed in the beneficiaries' hands, not the Trustees'. The Court emphasized that the shares need not be quantified at the Trust Deed's execution but must be determinable, as supported by the Trust Deed's provisions. The Court dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the Tribunal's findings and ruling in favor of the assessee. Other issues raised by the Revenue were deemed irrelevant.




                          Issues Involved:
                          1. Applicability of Section 164(1) of the Income Tax Act.
                          2. Determinability of beneficiaries' shares under the Trust Deed.
                          3. Assessment of income in the hands of Trustees versus beneficiaries.

                          Issue-wise Detailed Analysis:

                          1. Applicability of Section 164(1) of the Income Tax Act:
                          The primary issue for consideration was whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that the assessee trust could not be assessed as an Association of Persons (AOP) under Section 164(1) of the Income Tax Act, given that the shares of the beneficiaries were indeterminate or unknown. The Revenue contended that the assessing officer was justified in invoking Section 164(1) to assess the trust at the maximum marginal rate due to the indeterminability of the beneficiaries' shares.

                          2. Determinability of Beneficiaries' Shares under the Trust Deed:
                          The Tribunal examined whether the shares of the beneficiaries were determinable based on the Trust Deed. It was noted that the Trust Deed specified the manner in which income was to be distributed among the beneficiaries. The Tribunal found that the Trust Deed provided a clear formula for determining the shares of each beneficiary, thus making the shares determinable. The Tribunal cited CBDT Circular No. 281, which clarified that beneficiaries need not be named explicitly; they must be identifiable based on the Trust Deed. The Tribunal concluded that the provisions of Section 164(1) were not applicable as the beneficiaries and their shares were identifiable.

                          3. Assessment of Income in the Hands of Trustees versus Beneficiaries:
                          The Tribunal's finding that the shares of the beneficiaries were determinable led to the conclusion that the income should be taxed in the hands of the beneficiaries rather than the Trustees. The Tribunal referenced various judicial precedents, including the Hon'ble Madras High Court's decisions, which supported the view that identification by reference to the terms of the Trust Deed suffices, and it is not necessary for beneficiaries to be explicitly named.

                          Judgment Analysis:
                          The High Court upheld the Tribunal's decision, agreeing that the determinability of the beneficiaries' shares was a finding of fact based on the interpretation of the Trust Deed. The Court noted that such findings of fact are outside the scope of judicial review unless they are perverse. The Court defined perversity as findings not supported by the record or based on hypotheses or surmises. The Court found that the Tribunal's findings were reasonable and supported by the Trust Deed's provisions.

                          The Court rejected the Revenue's contention that the shares should be quantified at the time of the Trust Deed's execution. It emphasized that the real test is whether the shares are determinable, even if they are to be determined in the future. The Court concluded that the shares were determinable based on the beneficiaries' investments, meeting the legal requirements to avoid the applicability of Section 164.

                          Conclusion:
                          The High Court dismissed the appeals, affirming the Tribunal's decision that the shares of the beneficiaries were determinable and the income should be taxed in the hands of the beneficiaries, not the Trustees. The Court found no error in the Tribunal's judgment and ruled in favor of the assessee, answering the primary question in the affirmative against the Revenue. Consequently, other questions raised by the Revenue were deemed irrelevant and not addressed.
                          Full Summary is available for active users!
                          Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.

                          Topics

                          ActsIncome Tax
                          No Records Found