TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Join Channel
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: (i) Whether credits received from aircraft engine and component suppliers were capital receipt or revenue receipt. (ii) Whether supplementary lease rent was exempt under section 10(15A) and consequently not subject to tax deduction at source. (iii) Whether disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D required re-examination in light of interest specifically relatable to particular borrowings.
Issue (i): Whether credits received from aircraft engine and component suppliers were capital receipt or revenue receipt.
Analysis: The character of the receipt depended on the purpose for which it was granted. The credits were linked to the selection of engines and formed part of the commercial arrangement connected with acquisition of aircraft on lease. The mere fact that the aircraft were taken on lease, or that the credits were netted off against lease rentals in the accounts, did not alter the nature of the receipt. Applying the purpose test, the receipt was not in the nature of commission or trading income.
Conclusion: The credits were capital in nature and the addition was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Issue (ii): Whether supplementary lease rent was exempt under section 10(15A) and consequently not subject to tax deduction at source.
Analysis: The supplementary rent was examined in the light of the lease terms and the earlier coordinate bench and jurisdictional High Court rulings on identical leasing arrangements. The decisive requirement for exclusion from exemption was an inextricable link between the payment and the lessor supplying spares, facilities, or services. No material showed that the lessor supplied spares or rendered any such service in connection with the leased aircraft. The payment therefore remained within the exempt field of section 10(15A), and no obligation to deduct tax at source arose.
Conclusion: The supplementary lease rent was exempt and the disallowance under section 40(a)(i) was deleted in favour of the assessee.
Issue (iii): Whether disallowance under section 14A read with Rule 8D required re-examination in light of interest specifically relatable to particular borrowings.
Analysis: Disallowance under Rule 8D is confined to expenditure relatable to exempt income and does not extend to interest that is directly attributable to specific taxable or business purposes. The Assessing Officer's computation required reconsideration because the assessee claimed that substantial interest expenditure related to specific loans and not to investment activity. The matter therefore required fresh examination in accordance with the governing ratio on Rule 8D computation.
Conclusion: The issue was restored to the Assessing Officer for fresh computation and was decided only for statistical purposes, in favour of the assessee.
Final Conclusion: The assessee succeeded on the credits-from-suppliers issue and on the supplementary lease rent issue, while the section 14A disallowance was remitted for recomputation, leaving the appeals partly allowed for statistical purposes.
Ratio Decidendi: The nature of a receipt is determined by the purpose for which it is granted, and under Rule 8D only interest expenditure not directly attributable to specific income or receipts can be apportioned against exempt income.
TaxTMI 
