Transfer pricing arm's length price cannot be fixed at nil ad hoc where method and comparables are undisputed.

In transfer pricing matters, the arm's length price of an international transaction must be determined on the statutory parameters of the most appropriate method and comparable selection. The Transfer Pricing Officer cannot fix reimbursement of advertisement expenses at nil on an ad hoc basis when the assessee has applied the Transaction Net Margin Method and the selected method and comparables are not disputed. The officer's role is confined to transfer pricing analysis under Chapter X and does not extend to testing the allowability or genuineness of expenditure under section 37, which falls within the Assessing Officer's domain. The nil valuation was therefore unsustainable and the issue was decided for the assessee.

---

---

Issues: Whether the Transfer Pricing Officer could determine the arm's length price of reimbursement of advertisement expenses at nil on an ad hoc basis when the assessee had applied the Transaction Net Margin Method and the selected comparables and method were not disputed.

Analysis: The dispute concerned only the determination of arm's length price of an international transaction. The Transfer Pricing Officer's function under Chapter X of the Income-tax Act, 1961 is confined to examining whether the most appropriate method has been adopted and whether the comparables are appropriate. It is not within that jurisdiction to test the allowability or genuineness of the expenditure under section 37 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, which is a matter for the Assessing Officer. Here, the method selected by the assessee and the comparables used were not challenged, and the nil valuation was made without proper transfer pricing analysis.

Conclusion: The ad hoc determination of the arm's length price at nil could not be sustained, and the issue was answered in favour of the assessee.

Ratio Decidendi: In transfer pricing matters, the arm's length price must be determined only on the statutory parameters of the most appropriate method and comparables, and it cannot be fixed at nil on an ad hoc basis outside section 92C of the Income-tax Act, 1961.

---