Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether JCB Excavator, Tata Motor Grader and Soil Compactor used exclusively in road construction were eligible for depreciation at the higher rate as commercial vehicles.
Analysis: The claim for higher depreciation turned on whether the equipment fell within the expression "commercial vehicle" in the depreciation schedule. The Tribunal noted conflicting judicial views on whether such construction machinery, though registered under the Motor Vehicles Act, could be treated as motor lorries or commercial vehicles for the purposes of the Income-tax Rules. It also noted that some authorities had treated such equipment as plant and machinery eligible only for the normal rate, while other decisions had allowed the higher rate. Applying the principle that where two views are possible the one favourable to the assessee should be adopted, the Tribunal preferred the view supporting higher depreciation.
Conclusion: The assessee was entitled to depreciation at 50% on the JCB Excavator, Tata Motor Grader and Soil Compactor.
Ratio Decidendi: Where conflicting views exist on the depreciation eligibility of construction equipment, the interpretation favourable to the assessee must be adopted if the equipment is used as a commercial vehicle within the meaning of the relevant depreciation entry.