Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether bottling and packaging of liquor falls within the expression "packaging activity" under Section 65(76b) of the Finance Act, 1994 or is excluded as a process amounting to manufacture under Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944.
Analysis: The exclusion in Section 65(76b) is referential and must be read with the inclusive definition of manufacture in Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944. Manufacture includes any process incidental or ancillary to the completion of a manufactured product. On the facts governing country spirit, bottling and sealing are integral to the statutory process by which the liquor is rendered marketable and fit for supply, and the liquor cannot be sold otherwise than in sealed bottles under the excise regime. The Court also relied on the consistent understanding reflected in the Board circular and prior precedent that bottling, in this context, forms part of manufacture and not a separate taxable service of packaging.
Conclusion: Packaging and bottling of liquor are part of the manufacturing process and do not attract service tax under Section 65(76b) of the Finance Act, 1994.
Ratio Decidendi: Where the statutory scheme makes bottling and sealing an inseparable and incidental part of completing the product for sale, the activity is manufacture within Section 2(f) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 and is excluded from the taxable category of packaging activity under Section 65(76b) of the Finance Act, 1994.