Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether sales-tax refund received by a trader was eligible for deduction under section 80HHC of the Income-tax Act, 1961, and whether Explanation (baa) to section 80HHC applied so as to exclude such receipt from business profits.
Analysis: The assessee was a trader and not a manufacturer. On the facts, the sales-tax refund represented a reduction in the cost of purchases and not an independent income detached from the export activity. In a trader's case, the computation under section 80HHC proceeds on the basis of export turnover reduced by direct and indirect costs, and the mechanism in Explanation (baa) was held not to govern the assessee's case. The refund was also found to have a direct nexus with exports under the applicable sales tax framework. The reasoning adopted by the first appellate authority was consistent with the binding view relied upon from the Bombay High Court and the Supreme Court.
Conclusion: The sales-tax refund was held to be eligible for deduction under section 80HHC, and the Revenue's objection was rejected.
Ratio Decidendi: Where a trader's sales-tax refund merely reduces the purchase cost and has a direct nexus with export turnover, it forms part of the eligible export profit for deduction under section 80HHC and is not to be excluded as independent income under Explanation (baa).