1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New: Section-Wise Filter ✕
Just a moment...
1. Search Case laws by Section / Act / Rule — now available beyond Income Tax. GST and Other Laws Available
2. New: “In Favour Of” filter added in Case Laws.
Try both these filters in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
of 
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
<h1>Tribunal Waives Service Tax & Penalties, Emphasizes Fairness in Tax Disputes</h1> The Tribunal allowed the stay petition and waived the pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalties amounting to Rs. 5,27,018/- for the applicant. Despite a ... Earlier SCN was issued and Commissioner (Appeals) held in favour of the applicant and the order upheld by the Tribunal and thereafter for the same activity undertaken by the applicant a SCN was issued alleging suppression - present SCN was issued for the same activity and for same period demanding Service Tax treating the applicant has franchiser - contention is that as the issue in respect of same demand has already been settled, and no suppression can be alleged, therefore, the demand is not sustainable - stay granted Issues:Waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalties based on previous show-cause notice and settlement.Analysis:The case involved an application for the waiver of pre-deposit of Service Tax and penalties amounting to Rs. 5,27,018/- based on a demand confirmed against the applicant for providing franchise services. The applicant contended that a previous show-cause notice for the same period and activity had been issued, demanding Service Tax as a provider of commercial coaching center and training service. The Commissioner (Appeals) had set aside the demand in the earlier case, a decision upheld by the Tribunal. However, a subsequent show-cause notice was issued treating the applicant as a franchiser. The applicant argued that since the issue had already been settled, and no suppression could be alleged, the demand was not sustainable.The Tribunal considered the fact that a previous show-cause notice had been issued, and the Commissioner (Appeals) had ruled in favor of the applicant, a decision upheld by the Tribunal. Despite this, a new show-cause notice was issued for the same activity, alleging suppression. In light of these circumstances, the Tribunal found merit in the applicant's contention and waived the pre-deposit of the Service Tax and penalties. The stay petition was allowed, indicating a favorable decision for the applicant in this case.This judgment highlights the importance of considering previous decisions and settlements in similar cases when determining the sustainability of a demand. It also emphasizes the need for consistency and fairness in tax-related matters, ensuring that parties are not unduly burdened by repetitive or conflicting demands based on the same facts and circumstances.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
