Entry tax on excavators turns on road-use adaptation, requiring factual verification before liability is fixed.

Entry tax liability for a JCB excavator depends on whether the vehicle is mechanically propelled and adapted for use on public roads, so as to fall within the Motor Vehicles Act definition and the Tamil Nadu entry tax scheme. Where the vehicle's character is disputed, the taxing authority must first verify the physical nature of the excavator, including whether it is chain-mounted and not road-adapted, before fastening liability. An assessment made on assumption alone is unsustainable. The assessment was quashed and the matter remitted for fresh consideration after proper examination, if necessary, with the earlier binding ratio to be applied on the verified facts.

---

---

Issues: Whether the order levying entry tax on the JCB excavator could be sustained without first determining, on physical examination, whether the vehicle was a motor vehicle adapted for use on public roads and therefore liable to tax under the governing entry tax statute.

Analysis: Liability to entry tax under Section 3 of the Tamil Nadu Tax on Entry of Motor Vehicles into Local Areas Act, 1990 depends on the vehicle being one that is liable for registration under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. The statutory definition in Section 2(28) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 requires the vehicle to be mechanically propelled and adapted for use upon roads. The prior binding view relied upon by the parties drew a distinction between excavators that can ply on roads and excavators mounted on chains or similar tracks, which are not adapted for road use. The impugned order did not address this critical factual question and proceeded on an assumption that the excavator was chargeable to entry tax. That approach was unsustainable.

Conclusion: The assessment order was quashed. The matter was remitted to the Assessing Officer to recommence proceedings, if necessary, after physical examination of the vehicle, and to apply the earlier binding ratio if the vehicle is found to be a chain-mounted JCB excavator not adapted for use on roads.

Final Conclusion: The petitioner obtained relief against the impugned levy, but the revenue authorities were left free to reconsider tax liability after verifying the nature and use of the vehicle.

Ratio Decidendi: For entry tax liability on special-purpose vehicles, the decisive test is whether the vehicle is adapted for use on public roads; where that factual characterisation is disputed, the authority must first determine it on proper verification before fastening tax liability.

---