Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Case Laws - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
  • Title Only
  • Head Notes
  • Citation
Party Name: ?
Party name / Appeal No.
Include Word: ?
Searches for this word in Main (Whole) Text
Exclude Word: ?
This word will not be present in Main (Whole) Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • GST
  • Income Tax
  • Benami Property
  • Customs
  • Corporate Laws
  • Securities / SEBI
  • Insolvency & Bankruptcy
  • FEMA
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • CST, VAT & Sales Tax
  • Wealth tax
  • Indian Laws
Courts: ?
Select Court or Tribunal
---- All Courts ----
  • ---- All Courts ----
  • Supreme Court - All
  • Supreme Court
  • SC Orders / Highlights
  • High Court
  • Appellate Tribunal
  • Tribunal
  • Appellate authority for Advance Ruling
  • Advance Ruling Authority
  • National Financial Reporting Authority
  • Competition Commission of India
  • ANTI-PROFITEERING AUTHORITY
  • Commission
  • Central Government
  • Board
  • DISTRICT/ SESSIONS Court
  • Commissioner / Appellate Authority
  • Other
Situ: ?
State Name or City name of the Court
Landmark: ?
Where case is referred in other cases
---- All Cases ----
  • ---- All Cases ----
  • Referred in >= 3 Cases
  • Referred in >= 4 Cases
  • Referred in >= 5 Cases
  • Referred in >= 10 Cases
  • Referred in >= 15 Cases
  • Referred in >= 25 Cases
  • Referred in >= 50 Cases
  • Referred in >= 100 Cases
From Date: ?
Date of order
To Date:
TMI Citation:
Year
  • Year
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
  • 2010
  • 2009
  • 2008
  • 2007
  • 2006
  • 2005
  • 2004
  • 2003
  • 2002
  • 2001
  • 2000
  • 1999
  • 1998
  • 1997
  • 1996
  • 1995
  • 1994
  • 1993
  • 1992
  • 1991
  • 1990
  • 1989
  • 1988
  • 1987
  • 1986
  • 1985
  • 1984
  • 1983
  • 1982
  • 1981
  • 1980
  • 1979
  • 1978
  • 1977
  • 1976
  • 1975
  • 1974
  • 1973
  • 1972
  • 1971
  • 1970
  • 1969
  • 1968
  • 1967
  • 1966
  • 1965
  • 1964
  • 1963
  • 1962
  • 1961
  • 1960
  • 1959
  • 1958
  • 1957
  • 1956
  • 1955
  • 1954
  • 1953
  • 1952
  • 1951
  • 1950
  • 1949
  • 1948
  • 1947
  • 1946
  • 1945
  • 1944
  • 1943
  • 1942
  • 1941
  • 1940
  • 1939
  • 1938
  • 1937
  • 1936
  • 1935
  • 1934
  • 1933
  • 1932
  • 1931
  • 1930
Volume
  • Volume
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
TMI
Example : 2024 (6) TMI 204
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
TMI Citation
    No Records Found
    ❯❯
    MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
    0 / 200
    Expand Note
    Add to Folder

    No Folders have been created

      +

      Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

      NOTE:

      Case Laws
      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Results Found:
      AI TextQuick Glance by AIHeadnote
      Show All SummariesHide All Summaries
      No Records Found

      Case Laws

      Back

      All Case Laws

      Showing Results for :
      Reset Filters
      Showing
      Records
      ExpandCollapse
        No Records Found

        Case Laws

        Back

        All Case Laws

        Showing Results for : Reset Filters
        Case ID :

        📋
        Contents
        Note

        Note

        -

        Bookmark

        print

        Print

        Login to TaxTMI
        Verification Pending

        The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on

        Didn't receive the mail? Resend Mail

        Don't have an account? Register Here

        <h1>Court examines failed aircraft e-auction, delays, and valuation concerns, seeks fresh auction with new valuation report.</h1> The court addressed issues related to a failed e-auction for an aircraft due to low bids, leading to a request for a fresh auction by the Service Tax ... Auction of aircraft - earlier auction could not materialize for the reason that the offer price was less than the reserve price - now request made for fresh e-auction - Held that: - request for re-auction and grant further time, which would be delaying the process and the debts of all concerned would go on mounting, we would highly appreciate if before the next date, the authorities, who will now conduct the e-auction, place their valuation report before this court. That be placed in a sealed cover. That should be placed at the hearing of this writ petition and other matters scheduled on 19th January, 2017 - petition allowed - decided partly in favor of petitioner. Issues involved:1. Failure of e-auction due to low bids.2. Request for a fresh e-auction.3. Complaint about an aircraft blocking space at the airport.4. Intervention of Service Tax Commissioner in the sale of the aircraft.5. Lack of experience in disposal of aircraft by the Commissionerate.6. Request for a re-auction and valuation report submission.Issue 1: Failure of e-auction due to low bidsThe Deputy Commissioner of Service Tax stated that the highest bid received in the e-auction for an aircraft was significantly lower than the reserve price, making it unacceptable based on guiding principles. Despite the interest of a potential bidder who missed the e-auction but remained interested, the court questioned the reasons for not participating initially. The Service Tax Commissioner sought further time to re-start the e-auction process to obtain a fair price for the aircraft.Issue 2: Request for a fresh e-auctionThe Service Tax Commissioner requested a fresh e-auction to ensure a fair and reasonable price for the aircraft. The court expressed dissatisfaction with the delay caused by the need for a new auction process and emphasized the importance of obtaining a valuation report before proceeding further. The court set a deadline for the submission of the valuation report and warned of consequences if not provided on time.Issue 3: Complaint about an aircraft blocking space at the airportA complaint was raised by Mumbai International Airport Private Limited regarding the aircraft blocking space at the airport, affecting operations for multiple airlines. The entity sought the removal of the aircraft from the airport premises to alleviate the space crunch and facilitate smoother airport operations.Issue 4: Intervention of Service Tax Commissioner in the sale of the aircraftThe Service Tax Commissioner intervened in the sale of the aircraft due to outstanding dues, leading to the initiation of the auction process. Respondent no. 3, claiming rights in the aircraft leased to another party, agreed to the sale without prejudice to its rights. Despite efforts to involve other entities and competitive bidding, the aircraft remained unsold due to bids falling short of the reserve price.Issue 5: Lack of experience in disposal of aircraft by the CommissionerateThe Commissionerate lacked the necessary expertise and experience in the disposal of aircraft through competitive bidding, leading to unsuccessful attempts to sell the aircraft. Despite interventions from various entities, the bids received did not meet the reserve price requirements, prompting the need for a re-auction.Issue 6: Request for a re-auction and valuation report submissionThe court requested a fresh valuation report to be submitted before considering the request for a re-auction. Emphasizing the importance of obtaining an updated valuation reflecting the current market value of the aircraft, the court specified the agency responsible for conducting the valuation and set a deadline for the submission of the report. The court highlighted the need for a comprehensive valuation process to determine the appropriate reserve price for the re-auction.

        Topics

        ActsIncome Tax
        No Records Found