Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether penalty and tax could be levied under section 76 of the Rajasthan Value Added Tax Act, 2003 when the goods had already been supplied to JVVNL and were being transported only for installation and commissioning at different sites without a declaration form.
Analysis: The tender documents and certificates on record showed that the material was supplied to JVVNL and, after supply at Jaipur, became its property. The further movement of goods within the State was only to facilitate erection, installation and commissioning at various sites under the contract. In that situation, the absence of a declaration form did not justify treating the transportation as one intended for tax evasion, and the authorities below had adopted an unduly technical view of the transaction.
Conclusion: The levy of penalty and tax under section 76 was not sustainable and the finding of the Tax Board was liable to be interfered with in favour of the assessee.
Ratio Decidendi: Where goods are already supplied to the purchaser and are moved only for contractual installation or commissioning, such transport cannot be treated as transport with intent to evade tax merely because a declaration form was not produced, if the documentary record establishes the purchaser's ownership and the purpose of movement.