Tribunal reinstates registration for pilgrimage tours, citing alignment with charitable objectives.

The Tribunal set aside the CIT's cancellation of registration under section 12AA, reinstating the registration for the assessee. The Tribunal found the pilgrimage tours aligned with the charitable objectives, emphasizing that registration cannot be cancelled if activities are in line with the stated objects. It noted discrepancies in the CIT's reasoning, including lack of profit motive and insufficient grounds for cancellation. Ultimately, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, highlighting that the cancellation was not legally justified and restoring the registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act.

---

---

Issues involved:
Cancellation of registration u/s 12AA(3) based on commercial activities during religious tours.

Analysis:
1. The assessee's registration under section 12AA was cancelled due to organizing tours to religious places on commercial lines, leading to withdrawal of registration by the CIT. The AO observed the assessee operated like a tour operator, lacking charity elements, and the expenses were wrongly labeled as "charitable expenditure" to evade tax.

2. The assessee defended its activities as charitable, citing case laws and arguing the registration was granted based on charitable objects, which were being followed. The counsel contended that cancellation was unjustified as the activities aligned with the registered objectives.

3. The Tribunal noted that the AO's assessment recognized the religious and charitable nature of the society's activities, contradicting the CIT's cancellation rationale. The Tribunal emphasized that registration cannot be cancelled if the activities align with the registered objects, citing legal precedents.

4. Under section 12AA(3), registration can only be cancelled if activities are not genuine or deviate from the stated objects. The Tribunal found the assessee's pilgrimage tours aligned with its objectives and were not non-genuine, rendering the cancellation invalid, especially as the CIT's objection of commercial operations was not a valid ground.

5. The Tribunal highlighted discrepancies in the CIT's reasoning, such as lack of profit motive in charging fees for tours and minimal charges for comprehensive tour services. The absence of a specified date for registration cancellation further weakened the CIT's case, leading to the Tribunal's decision to set aside the CIT's order and reinstate the registration under section 12AA.

6. Ultimately, the Tribunal allowed the assessee's appeal, emphasizing that the CIT's cancellation of registration was not legally justified, and restored the registration under section 12AA of the Income Tax Act.

---