TaxTMI Login
Just a moment...
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Case Laws
of of All Case Laws
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of <h1>CESTAT Chennai dismisses Revenue's appeal, setting aside penalty based on doctrine of merger.</h1> The Revenue's appeal against the reduction of penalty to Rs. 10 lakhs was dismissed by CESTAT Chennai. The Tribunal had remanded the matter back to the ... Doctrine of merger - Whether penalty is to be imposed in terms of Rule 15 of CCR, 2004 read with Section 11AC of Central Excise Act, 1944 where the CENVAT denial has been confirmed? - Held that: - In the facts of the present case, since the penalty has been set aside by the Division Bench of this Tribunal in the appellant's own case [2016 (12) TMI 218 - CESTAT, CHENNAI], the present appeal filed by the department is unsustainable as the doctrine of merger applies. Hence, the appeal filed by the Revenue is accordingly dismissed. The Revenue appealed against reduction of penalty to Rs. 10 lakhs in Order-in-Appeal No.36/2015. The Tribunal had remanded the matter back to the adjudicating authority and held that no penalty shall be imposed. The appeal filed by the Revenue was dismissed as penalty was set aside, applying the doctrine of merger. (2016 (12) TMI 644 - CESTAT CHENNAI)
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
